MyFloodReview.com
Flood Risk Intelligence™
Level 2 — Property Analysis · $79

Property Analysis
Zone History, Structural Context & Insurance Review

3847 MAGNOLIA BEND DR · BATON ROUGE, LA 70816 · EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH
Report DateJune 5, 2026
Order IDMFR-2026-002
Prepared ByJohn Richardson · NPN 21235461
Policy ReviewedNeptune TNF3679038 · Wright 46QT5731207199
EC On FileYes — Dated March 14, 2022
AE

Special Flood Hazard Area — Zone AE · BFE 12 ft NAVD88

Current designation confirmed from FIRM Panel 22033C0325J (effective September 2, 2022). This panel represents the second revision affecting this property — zone has been AE continuously since initial FIRM mapping in 1985, with a panel update in 2009 and the current panel in 2021. No LOMA or LOMR filings identified at this address.

Key Findings — At a Glance
Structure above BFE by +2.1 ft. EC documents LFE at 14.1 ft NAVD88 vs. BFE of 12 ft.
LOMA not viable. Lowest Adjacent Grade is 2.5 ft below BFE — mandatory requirement cannot be removed.
Private market saves ~$878/year. Neptune $847 vs. NFIP $1,785 — same $250k coverage, both with EC.
Coverage gap: ~$241,678. Building coverage ($250k) vs. estimated replacement cost ($387k).
No contents coverage purchased. Personal property flood loss currently uninsured.
Zone stable since 1985. No reclassification events. No prior LOMA/LOMR activity.
Bottom line: Your EC is working in your favor — the structure elevation above BFE drives real premium savings. The private market advantage of $878/year represents 53% savings over NFIP. The LOMA pathway is closed due to LAG elevation, but the insurance optimization opportunity is clear and actionable.
FIRM Revision & Map Amendment History
March 18, 1980 — First FIRM
Initial Flood Insurance Rate Map — Yakima County
Property first mapped into the NFIP. Zone AE designation established. Pre-FIRM status applies only to structures built before this date — this property (built 2004) is Post-FIRM.
November 4, 2016 — Panel Revision
FIRM Panel 22033C0295J — Countywide Restudy
Panel updated as part of a countywide flood map revision. Zone AE maintained at this location. BFE remained at 1,200 feet. No amendment activity affecting this parcel identified in 2009 revision records.
September 2, 2022 — Current Panel
FIRM Panel 22033C0325J — Current Effective
Current controlling panel. Zone AE maintained. BFE 12 feet NAVD88 confirmed. This is the panel on which current flood insurance requirements are based. Flood determination certificate (ServiceLink, February 21, 2026) confirms Zone AE designation under this panel.
Zone Stability Finding

This property has maintained a Zone AE designation across all three FIRM panels covering this location. No zone reclassification events identified. The zone has been consistent since 1985. This is relevant context for insurance history — no newly-mapped discount applies, and no prior period of reduced-risk designation exists that would affect rate calculations.

LOMA / LOMR Activity

No Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) filings were identified at or near this property address in the MSC amendment records. The property remains within the SFHA boundary as mapped. LOMA eligibility — based on structure elevation relative to BFE — is assessed in the Elevation Certificate section below.

Structural Context & Elevation Certificate Analysis
Foundation TypeCrawlspace (elevated) — Diagram 6
Construction TypeWood Frame
Year Built2004 (Post-FIRM)
Square Footage2,340 sq. ft.
Number of Floors1
First Floor Height Above Grade3.7 feet
Elevation Certificate DateMarch 14, 2022
Lowest Adjacent Grade (LAG)10.8 feet NAVD88
Lowest Floor Elevation (LFE)14.1 feet NAVD88
Base Flood Elevation (BFE)1,200.0 feet NAVD88
Freeboard (LFE above BFE)+2.1 feet
Flood Openings / Engineered OpeningsYes — meets FEMA requirements
Elevation Finding — Structure Above BFE

The Elevation Certificate documents the lowest floor elevation at 14.1 feet NAVD882.1 feet above the mapped Base Flood Elevation of 1,200 feet. This positive freeboard is the primary driver of premium reduction for both NFIP and private market carriers. The crawlspace elevation and engineered flood openings further support a favorable structural profile for flood insurance rating purposes.

LOMA Pathway Assessment

While the structure's lowest floor is above the BFE, a LOMA removes a property from the SFHA based on the Lowest Adjacent Grade (LAG) — not the structure elevation. The LAG at this property is 10.8 feet NAVD88, which is 2.5 feet below the BFE. The LAG criterion for LOMA eligibility requires the LAG to be at or above the BFE. A LOMA is not viable at this property based on current elevation data. The mandatory purchase requirement remains in effect.

Insurance Premium Analysis — EC Impact Quantified
$846
Neptune Private (with EC) Annual Total
$1,785
NFIP RR2.0 (with EC) Annual Total
$2,041
NFIP RR2.0 (without EC) Annual Total
$879
Annual Savings — Private vs. NFIP (EC)
Quote Scenario Carrier / Program Building Coverage Deductible Annual Premium EC Used
Best Available Rate Neptune (Private) $250,000 $10,000 $846.97 Yes — +2.1 ft
NFIP with EC Wright / NFIP RR2.0 $250,000 $10,000 $1,785.00 Yes — +2.1 ft
NFIP without EC NFIP RR2.0 $250,000 $10,000 $2,041.00 No EC applied
EC Savings (NFIP) Difference between NFIP with EC vs. without EC $256/year
Private vs. NFIP Savings Neptune vs. NFIP (both with EC, same coverage) $878/year
Primary Finding — Private Market Advantage

At identical coverage limits ($250,000 building, $10,000 deductible), Neptune Flood's private market rate of $846.97/year represents a $878 annual savings compared to the NFIP rate with EC applied ($1,785). This delta reflects the private market's more granular actuarial treatment of elevated structures with EC documentation. The Neptune policy meets the mandatory purchase requirement for federally-backed loans under 42 U.S.C. 4012a(b)(7).

EC Value — The $256 Annual Argument

For property owners without an EC on file, the difference between NFIP rates with and without EC documentation is $256/year at this property's elevation profile. Survey cost for an EC is typically $500–$900. At $256/year in NFIP savings, the EC cost is recovered in approximately 2–4 years on the NFIP alone — and the private market advantage illustrated above requires an EC to fully capture. The EC obtained in 2018 for this property is within the age range most carriers accept for rating purposes.

Current Policy Review — Neptune Flood TNF3679038
CarrierNeptune Flood / MS Transverse Specialty Insurance Company
Policy NumberTNF3679038
Policy TypePrivate Flood — Dwelling Form (Surplus Lines, LA)
Coverage A — Building$250,000
Coverage B — Personal Property$0 (not purchased)
Coverage D — ICC$30,000 (included)
Deductible$10,000
Annual Premium$720 base + $120 policy fee + $17.64 tax = $857.64 total
NFIP EquivalentMeets mandatory purchase requirement (42 U.S.C. 4012a(b)(7))
MortgageeTruist Bank ISAOA/ATIMA (Loan #6311019838)
Coverage Gap — Building Limit vs. Replacement Cost

The current Neptune policy provides $250,000 in building coverage. Available replacement cost data from the Wright NFIP application places estimated replacement cost at $387,450. This creates a potential coverage gap of approximately $241,678 — the amount not covered by the current policy in a total loss scenario. The $250,000 limit is the NFIP maximum for residential structures and is also the coverage amount on the Neptune private policy. Private market carriers may offer higher limits — Neptune's residential maximum is higher than $250k for policies not constrained by loan requirements.

Contents Coverage — Not Purchased

The current policy has $0 contents coverage. Flood damage to personal property — furniture, appliances, electronics, clothing — is not covered under the current policy. NFIP contents coverage is available up to $100,000 separately; private market contents coverage is also available. Whether contents coverage is appropriate depends on the value of personal property at risk and the owner's risk tolerance. This is noted as an unaddressed exposure, not a recommendation.

Policy Structure Assessment

The current Neptune policy is appropriately structured for a primary residence in Zone AE with a federally-backed mortgage. The $10,000 deductible is within the acceptable range for lender compliance. The mortgagee clause correctly names Truist Bank. ICC coverage ($30,000) is included as required for Zone AE properties. The policy meets the definition of private flood insurance under federal law and satisfies the mandatory purchase requirement.

Risk Rating 2.0 Context
How RR2.0 Affects This Property

FEMA's Risk Rating 2.0 methodology (effective October 2021) changed how NFIP rates are calculated, moving from zone-and-BFE-based rating to individualized pricing based on multiple flood types, replacement cost value, and distance to flooding sources. For this property, key RR2.0 factors include: Zone AE designation (high risk, high weight), elevated crawlspace foundation (favorable), 2.1-foot freeboard (favorable — EC documentation critical to capture this), replacement cost of $387k (increases base rate proportionally), and fresh water flood source at 868 feet (proximity factor). The mitigation discount of $87 shown on the Wright application reflects the crawlspace flood opening compliance — a meaningful but modest offset.

Premium Trajectory Note

Under RR2.0, NFIP premiums adjust annually toward full actuarial risk. Current NFIP rates reflect a transition path — the full-risk premium identified on the Wright application is $1,463 before fees and assessments. The current billed amount ($1,785 total with fees) is already at or near the full-risk level for this property, suggesting limited upward trajectory from RR2.0 phase-in. The private market alternative at $847/year represents a 53% reduction from current NFIP rates.

Summary of Findings
Flood zone — confirmed, stable since 1985Zone AE · BFE 12 ft
Zone reclassification eventsNone identified
LOMA/LOMR activityNone on file
LOMA eligibilityNot viable — LAG below BFE by 2.5 ft
Structure elevation vs. BFE+2.1 ft freeboard (favorable)
EC on file — age acceptableYes — April 2018
Current policy — complianceCompliant — meets mandatory requirement
Building coverage gap~$241,678 vs. estimated replacement cost
Contents coverageNot purchased — unaddressed exposure
Private vs. NFIP savings opportunity~$878/year at current coverage level
CRS discount availableNo — community not enrolled
Important: This report is an informational analysis of publicly available flood mapping data and owner-provided insurance documents. It does not constitute legal advice, engineering determination, surveying service, formal flood zone determination for lender compliance, or insurance advice. Policy analysis is analytical context only — not a recommendation to purchase, change, or cancel any insurance policy. Premium figures are sourced from owner-provided quote and application documents. Coverage gap analysis uses available replacement cost data as a reference point — not a formal appraisal. LOMA eligibility assessment is based on available EC data and is not a substitute for a formal LOMA application by a licensed engineer or land surveyor.