Our Story

Built by someone who went all the way in

MyFloodReview wasn't built by a tech company, an insurance conglomerate, or a government agency. It was built by a property owner who spent years in the primary source record — reading the Flood Insurance Study, submitting public records requests, studying the mapping science — and came out the other side with expertise most professionals don't have and most property owners never get access to.

John Richardson — MyFloodReview

John Richardson

Licensed Insurance Professional · FEMA/Flood Mapping Specialist · Multi-State

NPN21235461 Multi-State Licensed FEMA Mapping Specialist Flood Insurance Producer
The Story Behind the Service

From property owner to flood intelligence specialist

It started with a building project. When I began developing on a parcel that had been mapped into a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area, I did what most property owners do: I accepted the designation and started working within the system. But the more I looked, the more questions I had. And the more questions I asked, the more I realized that the answers weren't readily available — not from local officials, not from insurance agents, not from carriers.

So I went to the primary source. I obtained the Flood Insurance Study — the technical document underlying the Flood Insurance Rate Map — and read it. All 300+ pages. More than once. I studied the hydrology methodology, the hydraulic modeling, split flow analysis, the cross-section data, and the engineering work product that forms the scientific basis for flood zone designations. What I found was illuminating in ways I hadn't anticipated.

"The information existed in the public record. What was missing was someone willing to find it, read it, and understand what it actually meant."

I submitted Public Records Act requests — extensive, multi-year requests that produced a substantial documentary record. That record revealed information that officials, insurance agents, carriers, and neighboring property owners had no awareness of. Information that had direct bearing on the actual flood hazard — or lack thereof — affecting the properties in question.

Armed with that information — the FIS, the PRA record, the mapping history, the regulatory correspondence — I was able to make an educated, informed, and ultimately correct determination of the actual flood hazard affecting my property. Not the designation on the map. The actual hazard. That determination led to meaningful outcomes: building allowances, informed policy choices that met compliance requirements while minimizing unnecessary cost, and the ability to use an elevation certificate strategically because I understood exactly what it documented and how it would be applied.

The experience also revealed something about the system itself. Flood mapping is not a purely technical exercise. It operates at the intersection of science, regulatory policy, community compliance requirements, federal funding incentives, and — in some cases — processes that don't survive close scrutiny. Property owners who understand this dynamic are better positioned to protect their interests. Those who don't are at the mercy of a system that rarely explains itself.

Eventually I obtained my insurance producer license with a specialization in flood — not primarily to sell policies, but to ensure I could speak to every dimension of flood risk with the authority and legal standing the analysis requires. That license, combined with years of primary source research, is what makes MyFloodReview different from anything else available to property owners.

We serve property owners across multiple states — West Coast, Gulf Coast, Southern coastal, and beyond — wherever the intersection of federal flood mapping policy, local regulatory pressure, and individual property rights creates the kind of complexity that benefits from independent, informed analysis.

What Most Property Owners Don't Know

Flood mapping is not a neutral technical exercise

FEMA flood maps reflect science, policy, politics, and community-level financial incentives — often simultaneously. Understanding the full picture changes how you read your designation.

🏛️ Community Compliance Pressure

Communities that participate in the NFIP must adopt and enforce FEMA-approved floodplain management ordinances. Non-compliant communities risk losing access to federal flood insurance and federal disaster assistance. This creates structural incentives for communities to expand SFHA designations — more properties in high-risk zones means more premium volume flowing into the program.

📡 Evolving Mapping Strategies

FEMA's mapping program is actively working to convert properties currently in Zone X and Zone A into Special Flood Hazard Areas as mapping technology improves and political pressure for actuarial soundness increases. Properties that have never been in the SFHA are increasingly being swept into it — including properties with natural elevation advantages, natural barriers, existing mitigations, and in some cases, mapping that doesn't withstand technical scrutiny.

⚖️ Property Rights Implications

A flood zone designation is not merely an insurance matter. It triggers development restrictions, permitting requirements, substantial improvement rules, addition limitations, and in some cases affects property valuation in ways relevant to eminent domain proceedings. The designation affects what you can do with your property — not just what you pay to insure it.

How we approach this: MyFloodReview provides independent analysis of publicly available flood mapping data, the FIS, regulatory records, and mapping history. We give property owners the information they need to understand their situation and make informed decisions. We do not make legal determinations, challenge government actions on behalf of clients, or promise specific outcomes. What we do is make the primary source record accessible and interpretable — which is itself a significant advantage most property owners have never had.

How We Work

Our methodology

Every report follows the same rigorous process. What changes with each level is the depth and scope of analysis, not the quality of research.

📋 Intake Review

We start with your intake information — understanding your specific situation, concerns, and history before touching any data source.

🗺️ FIRM & FIS Analysis

We analyze the current FIRM panel and, where relevant, the underlying Flood Insurance Study — the technical document most property owners and agents never read.

📜 Mapping History

We review LOMA and LOMR records, map revision history, and amendment activity affecting your property and surrounding area.

💰 Insurance Analysis

We assess NFIP vs. private market options, Risk Rating 2.0 implications, and relevant policy factors for your situation.

⚡ Regulatory Context

We flag applicable floodplain management requirements, development restrictions, and regulatory changes affecting your property.

✅ Professional Review

Every report is reviewed by a licensed professional before delivery. We never send automated output without human verification.

Data Sources

Built on primary sources

Our analysis draws from authoritative public data — the same sources federal regulators, lenders, and insurance carriers use. We go deeper into the underlying technical record than most practitioners ever do.

📄

Flood Insurance Study (FIS)

The technical foundation underlying every FIRM — hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, modeling methodology, cross-section data

🏛️

FEMA FIRM Maps

Current and historical Flood Insurance Rate Maps and FIRM panels

📡

FEMA NFHL API

National Flood Hazard Layer — current digital data

🌊

USGS StreamStats

Watershed data, stream proximity, flow analysis

🗂️

County GIS Records

Parcel data, elevation, local flood history

📋

LOMA/LOMR Database

Map amendment and revision records

Ready to Get Started?

Independent flood intelligence for your property

Reports reviewed by a licensed flood insurance professional before delivery. Plain language you can act on.

View Report Options → Learn About Flood Risk